investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

The Council of Canadians | 22-Sep-2015
A new report formulates an innovative trade deal exemption clause that allows countries to pursue environmental and climate change policy free from the chilling effects resulting from investor-state dispute settlement provisions in trade agreements.
FFII | 22-Sep-2015
The European Commission has published its investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS) reform proposal for the EU-US trade agreement under negotiation (TTIP), which institutionalises discrimination.
Tercera Información | 21-Sep-2015
"Antes de explicar por qué sostengo que el TTIP es un peligro indiscutible para todos nosotros, déjenme señalar que también creo que podemos derrotarlo; y cuando hablo de “nosotros” me refiero a los ciudadanos corrientes, tanto estadounidenses como europeos. "
No al TTIP | 21-Sep-2015
Ecologistas en Acción considera que la propuesta para maquillar el mecanismo de solución de controversias entre inversores y Estados (ISDS) presentada ayer por la Comisión Europea sigue dando a las multinacionales el privilegio exclusivo de desafiar leyes nacionales y comunitarias.
Sputnik | 18-Sep-2015
La delegación de Izquierda Unida en el Parlamento Europeo está presionando para que la Comisión Europea aclare por escrito si el polémico Acuerdo en Comercio de Servicios, conocido como TiSA por su siglas en inglés, incluirá un mecanismo de blindaje a las multinacionales (ISDS), según recoge el diario Público.
Rebelión | 18-Sep-2015
Amigos de la Tierra se opone a cualquier tipo de arbitraje que otorgue derechos a las empresas por encima de gobiernos y ciudadanos.
Norges Sosiale Forum NSF | 18-Sep-2015
The greatest challenges of our time is to end the unjust distribution in the world and to fight climate change.
GetUp! | 18-Sep-2015
Under the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), multinational corporations will be able to sue the Australian Government in secret corporate courts over laws that protect our health, environment and workers’ rights.
Le Devoir | 18-Sep-2015
Le mécanisme de règlement des différends indispose une majorité de citoyens
RT | 17-Sep-2015
Visant à rendre l’ISDS acceptable, les modifications de forme proposées menacent d’étendre considérablement le champ de cette justice aux services des multinationales