Latin America

Latin American and Caribbean countries have signed almost 700 investment agreements. They have been targeted in almost 300 investor-state disputes.

Argentina has faced almost 62 ISDS cases, about 6% of all cases, making it the world’s most targeted state. Venezuela and Mexico have been among the ten most frequent respondents in the world, with 51 and 33 cases, respectively.

Many key cases such as Renco vs. Peru, Chevron vs. Ecuador or Pac Rim vs. El Salvador have originated in significant environmental damages caused by corporations. Philip Morris took an ISDS case against Uruguay over its anti-tobacco law.

Chile, Mexico and Peru are also party to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) with eight other Pacific Rim states. The TPP includes an investor-state dispute mechanism that undermines public-interest ‘safeguards’.

The most well-known cases ISDS cases in the region include:

Chevron (US) vs. Ecuador: For 26 years, Texaco, later acquired by Chevron, performed oil operations in Ecuador. Ecuadorian courts found that during that period the company dumped billions of gallons of toxic water and dug hundreds of open-air oil sludge pits in Ecuador’s Amazon, poisoning the communities of some 30,000 Amazon residents. After a legal battle spanning two decades, in November 2013, Ecuador’s highest court ordered the corporation to pay $9.5 billion to provide desperately needed clean-up and health care to afflicted indigenous communities. Chevron challenged the decisions produced by Ecuador’s domestic legal system before an ISDS tribunal. In 2018, the arbitration tribunal held that the $9.5 billion judgment was fraudulent, violated international public policy and should not be recognised or enforced by the courts of other States. The amount of the award has not been established yet. (Ecuador-United States BIT invoked)

Occidental Petroleum Corporation “Oxy” (US) vs. Ecuador: in 2012 Ecuador was ordered to pay US$1.77 billion to the investor, an oil exploration and production company, for breach of contract. Sentence was reduced to US$1 billion in November 2015 (Ecuador-United States BIT invoked).

Investors vs. Argentina: When Argentina froze its utility rates in response to its 2001-2002 financial crisis, it was hit by over 40 lawsuits from investors, including Suez & Vivendi (France), Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A (Spain) and Anglian Water (UK). The ISDS tribunal concluded that Argentina had breached the investors’ right to fair and equitable treatment. By 2014, the country had been ordered to pay a total of US$980 million (various BITs invoked).

Photo: Sairen42 / CC BY-SA 3.0

(April 2020)

CIAR Global | 30-Jul-2021
Por CIAR Global | 30-7-21 Números del arbitraje de inversión: Perú el país más demandado El Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (CIADI) ha publicado la carga de casos del ejercicio fiscal 2021 donde ha registrado 70 nuevos procedimientos y administró un total de 332 casos. Perú es el país más demandado en este periodo con seis procedimientos de arbitraje de inversiones, con tres procedimientos le siguen México, Egipto, Tanzania y Turkmenistán. Según la (...)
CIAR Global | 30-Jul-2021
La compañía petrolera Perenco ha llegado a un acuerdo con Ecuador en las negociaciones por el pago del laudo de 435 millones de dólares en el marco de la larga disputa sobre la asignación de los beneficios de dos contratos de participación, que datan de 2002, a raíz de la adopción de legislación, por parte de Ecuador, que modificó la participación que Perenco recibía en virtud de varios Contratos de Hidrocarburos en la Región Amazónica Ecuatoriana.
CIAR Global | 26-Jul-2021
La Corte Constitucional ecuatoriana ha resuelto que la firma por parte del Gobierno de Ecuador del Convenio del Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (CIADI) no requiere la aprobación legislativa de la Asamblea Nacional, previo a su ratificación.
Inequality.org | 26-Jul-2021
Pakistan is the latest country to reject the system that allows private investors to sue governments in international tribunals. But Ecuador is back-tracking and the lawsuits continue to proliferate.
LVSL | 21-Jul-2021
Le règlement des différends entre investisseurs et États (ISDS) permet aux capitalistes étrangers de piétiner les droits des Équatoriens.
La Jornada | 20-Jul-2021
Pakistán avanza en desmantelar el infame, neoliberal y supranacional sistema de “Arreglo de Disputas Inversionista-Estado’. Ecuador Retrocede. Estados Unidos recibe la mayor demanda de su historia. México, ¿qué hará?
Prensa Latina | 20-Jul-2021
Volver al Ciadi es ’preparar el camino para más pobreza de millones y más riqueza para las empresas a través de los Tratados de Libre Comercio, privatizaciones y proyectos extractivistas’, según Salvador Quishpe.
Diario Uchile | 19-Jul-2021
La solución de controversias inversor-Estado (ISDS) permite a los capitalistas extranjeros atropellar los derechos de los Ecuatorianos.
Derecho Internacional | 16-Jul-2021
El pasado 4 de junio del 2021, fue dado a conocer el laudo arbitral de un tribunal del CIADI, el cual pone un punto final a la demanda interpuesta en febrero del 2014 por la empresa minera canadiense Infinito Gold contra Costa Rica.
Institute for New Economic Thinking | 15-Jul-2021
Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) allow foreign capitalists to run roughshod over the rights of Ecuadorians.

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | ... | 1150