Utility corporations have used investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions found in trade and investment agreements to challenge state attempts to regulate privatized public services such as water, social security or other services.

In response to several governments which have tried to lower public services rates for poorer populations or in face of a significant economic crisis, foreign companies have initiated ISDS disputes, claiming they were treated “unfairly”, due to their loss of profits.

Potentially, any significant reforms of standards in relation to major infrastructure or utilities and associated services could be the target of ISDS.

As of end of 2019, about 2/3 of all ISDS disputes concerned the services sector at large, including public services but also financial services, telecommunications, transport, construction, etc.

Most well-known disputes include:

• Azurix (US) v. Argentina: US$165 million awarded in 2006 to the investor, a water company. The dispute arose from the contamination of a reservoir, which made the water undrinkable in the area. The firm claimed the government had expropriated its investment and denied the firm “fair and equitable treatment” by not allowing rate increases and not investing sufficient public funds in the water infrastructure (Argentina-US BIT invoked).

• Tampa Electric Company “TECO” (US) vs. Guatemala: the US-based energy company challenged Guatemala’s decision to lower the electricity rates that a private utility could charge. TECO was awarded US$25 million in 2013 (CAFTA invoked).

• TCW (US) vs. Dominican Republic: the US investment management corporation that jointly owned with the government one of the Dominican Republic’s three electricity distribution firms, sued the government for failing to raise electricity rates and to prevent electricity theft by poor residents. Case settled in 2009 for US$26.5 million paid to the investor (CAFTA invoked).

Photo: Aqua Mechanical / CC BY 2.0

(March 2020) & GRAIN | 31-Oct-2023
ماذا سيكون تأثير هذا الاتفاق على السكان الأفارقة العاديين، في حقبة الأزمة المناخية والاقتصادية والغذائية هذه؟
ch-aviation | 31-Oct-2023
The Paris Appeal Court has found in favour of Air Canada in its long-standing dispute with Venezuela over the payment of about USD21 million in compensation for airline ticket revenues withheld by the South American country.
IISD | 31-Oct-2023
Le tribunal ad hoc constitué en vertu du traité a scindé la procédure en deux parties, l’une portant sur sa compétence et l’autre sur le fond du recours. & GRAIN | 10-Oct-2023
Quel impact cet accord commercial aura-t-il sur les populations africaines ordinaires, en cette période de crise climatique, économique et alimentaire ? & GRAIN | 10-Oct-2023
So what does this trade deal mean for ordinary Africans in a time of deep climate, economic and food crises?
The Gleaner | 9-Oct-2023
Jamaican business mogul Michael Lee-Chin has been awarded more than US$43 million in an investment dispute with the Dominican Republic.
Le Desk | 22-Sep-2023
La société espagnole réclame 407 millions d’euros au Maroc, soit pas moins de 4 milliards de dirhams.
St. Vincent Times | 22-Sep-2023
Grenada government in talks with developers to resume major hotel project after a resolution to their dispute.
Maghreb Intelligence | 14-Sep-2023
L’entreprise de construction de Marina d’Or réclame 400 millions d’euros pour deux projets ratés de création de deux villes satellites à Rabat et Tanger.
Telecompaper | 11-Sep-2023
La compañía peruano-mexicana Azteca Comunicaciones ha presentado un arbitraje de inversiones contra Perú ante el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (CIADI), después de anunciarlo desde 2021.