Services

Utility corporations have used investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions found in trade and investment agreements to challenge state attempts to regulate privatized public services such as water, social security or other services.

In response to several governments which have tried to lower public services rates for poorer populations or in face of a significant economic crisis, foreign companies have initiated ISDS disputes, claiming they were treated “unfairly”, due to their loss of profits.

Potentially, any significant reforms of standards in relation to major infrastructure or utilities and associated services could be the target of ISDS.

As of end of 2019, about 2/3 of all ISDS disputes concerned the services sector at large, including public services but also financial services, telecommunications, transport, construction, etc.

Most well-known disputes include:

• Azurix (US) v. Argentina: US$165 million awarded in 2006 to the investor, a water company. The dispute arose from the contamination of a reservoir, which made the water undrinkable in the area. The firm claimed the government had expropriated its investment and denied the firm “fair and equitable treatment” by not allowing rate increases and not investing sufficient public funds in the water infrastructure (Argentina-US BIT invoked).

• Tampa Electric Company “TECO” (US) vs. Guatemala: the US-based energy company challenged Guatemala’s decision to lower the electricity rates that a private utility could charge. TECO was awarded US$25 million in 2013 (CAFTA invoked).

• TCW (US) vs. Dominican Republic: the US investment management corporation that jointly owned with the government one of the Dominican Republic’s three electricity distribution firms, sued the government for failing to raise electricity rates and to prevent electricity theft by poor residents. Case settled in 2009 for US$26.5 million paid to the investor (CAFTA invoked).

Photo: Aqua Mechanical / CC BY 2.0

(March 2020)

MercoPress | 27-Aug-2021
The investment fund Titan Consortium has taken legal steps after the expropriation of Aerolineas Argentinas in 2008, which resulted in an arbitration award against Argentina.
Bloomberg | 13-Aug-2021
Draft law, regulator pose risks to Discovery’s unit in Poland but Polish watchdog says treaty exempts broadcast investments.
CIAR Global | 19-Jul-2021
La controversia se relaciona con la cancelación por parte del Gobierno local de la isla de Hainan (China) de la segunda edición de un festival internacional de jazz programada para 2014.
The Indian Express | 30-Jun-2021
The Mauritius investors is seeking to get Air India declared an alter ego of India in order to pursue assets of the national carrier as a strategy to enforce arbitration awards against the government.
CIAR Global | 14-Jun-2021
La compañía Kaloti Metals & Logistics ha presentado un arbitraje de inversiones contra Perú en el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones (CIADI). Tras la demanda una investigación por comercio ilegal y blanqueo de capitales.
JuriGuide | 3-Jun-2021
Le groupe koweïtien Agility estime avoir été exproprié par l’État irakien dans le cadre du rachat d’une entreprise locale en commun avec le groupe français Orange.
The Wire | 1-Jun-2021
At the core of this dispute is a 2005 agreement between Antrix and Devas for the lease of satellite spectrum which was annulled in 2011.
Les Echos | 25-May-2021
Sodexo a annoncé la confirmation par le CIRDI de la décision arbitrale qui avait été rendue en sa faveur en janvier 2019.
Médias24 | 25-May-2021
Suite à une transaction, désistement des deux parties dans leur arbitrage au CIRDI. Le Maroc risquait une condamnation à 50 millions d’euros.
Le Soir d’Algérie | 21-May-2021
Un groupe cimentier égyptien réclame à l’Algérie le versement de 900 millions de dollars et menace de le mener à l’arbitrage international.

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | ... | 260