investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

EJIL: Talk! | 15-May-2017
While the debate on the treaty regulating business impact on human rights is likely to continue for a while longer, some recent developments in international investment law seem to be moving forward on international human rights law obligations for businesses
SAT PR | 15-May-2017
The Rules on Transparency provide procedural rules that ensure transparency and public accessibility to treaty-based investor-State arbitration.
Lexology | 15-May-2017
While India and Indonesia may have withdrawn from existing BITs, this does not necessarily leave foreign investors without any protection.
People Over Profit | 12-May-2017
#NoRCEP week of actions at the 18th TNC Meeting of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership
ISDS Blog | 11-May-2017
Morocco and Nigeria signed a new investment treaty, which is a good illustration of the new “generation” of investment protection.
Tele Sur | 11-May-2017
Just days before his term ends, Rafael Correa said he will take a stand against agreements signed before the country’s Citizens Revolution.
El Telégrafo | 10-May-2017
El 45% de las demandas que llegan al Centro y son decididas en sus tribunales se inclinan hacia las pretensiones de las transnacionales, según la Caitisa. Esta noticia ha sido publicada originalmente por Diario EL TELÉGRAFO bajo la siguiente dirección: http://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/economia/8/paises-cuestionan-el-rol-del-ciadi-sobre-arbitrajes-en-los-tbi Si va a hacer uso de la misma, por favor, cite nuestra fuente y coloque un enlace hacia la nota original. www.eltelegrafo.com.ec
CIAR Global | 10-May-2017
El pasado 5 de mayo, el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias relativas a Inversiones, Ciadi, rechazó la solicitud de anulación del laudo del arbitraje Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. y Vivendi Universal S.A. contra la República Argentina.
Transnational Dispute Management | 10-May-2017
In its September 20, 2016 Ruling, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court refused to set aside an Award in a UNCITRAL investment arbitration between Recofi SA, a French company, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction.
Le Monde De l’Energie | 9-May-2017
Le tribunal arbitral de la Banque mondiale a condamné l’Espagne à indemniser un fonds britannique s’estimant lésé par la chute des subventions au secteur des énergies renouvelables.