investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

IISD | 26-Apr-2019
If the investment regime is to be made supportive of development and overcome its legitimacy crisis confronting, something more is required than procedural reforms to ISDS.
Le Figaro | 26-Apr-2019
Le groupe de gestion de l’eau et des déchets Suez a annoncé avoir touché une indemnité de l’Argentine pour la résiliation d’un contrat décidée par le gouvernement argentin en 2006, en application d’une décision arbitrale.
Buenos Aires Times | 26-Apr-2019
French water and waste management company receives compensation from the government, settling one of its legal disputes with country dating back to Néstor Kirchner’s presidency.
The Star | 26-Apr-2019
Kenya spends at least Sh500 million in defending a single case filed by investors at international courts under the Bilateral Investment Treaties, according to a regional trade negotiation institute.
IISD | 25-Apr-2019
Los tribunales carecen tanto de una concepción coherente de lo que constituye una conducta políticamente motivada como de un entendimiento consistente de la relevancia, si fuera el caso, de tales motivaciones para tratar las demandas jurídicas de los inversores extranjeros.
IISD | 25-Apr-2019
Les tribunaux manquent à la fois d’une conception cohérente de ce qui constitue une conduite à motivation politique et d’une compréhension cohérente de la pertinence, le cas échéant, de telles motivations pour les décisions relatives aux recours juridiques d’investisseurs étrangers.
IISD | 25-Apr-2019
Tribunals lack both a coherent conception of what constitutes politically motivated conduct and a consistent understanding of the relevance, if any, of such motivations for the disposition of foreign investors’ legal claims.
YubaNet | 25-Apr-2019
The company filed the suit in December 2018 for alleged violations of the Central America–Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR).
S&P Global | 25-Apr-2019
EU plans to extend its internal energy market rules to Russia’s Nord Stream 2 natural gas link to Germany could breach the Energy Charter Treaty, which protects international investors, according to the Swiss-registered company building it.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 24-Apr-2019
After Brexit, the UK will be theoretically a suitable jurisdiction to enforce intra-EU awards.