investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

EJIL: Talk! | 26-Jan-2021
One of the most noticeable facts in recent ISDS is the spectacular inflation of compensation awarded to investors. The most important factor is probably the widespread use by tribunals of the DCF (discounted cash flows) valuation method.
ALAI | 25-Jan-2021
En el 2020, los inversionistas extranjeros presentaron en el CIADI del Banco Mundial al menos 55 demandas conocidas exigiendo enormes sumas a los gobiernos, mientras éstos combaten la pandemia del coronavirus.
Live Mint | 25-Jan-2021
Investors have written to the Indian government as well as the governments of the US and UK seeking adherence to the award of a tribunal at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague
Memesita | 22-Jan-2021
Nuevo Pudahuel had asked the Ministry of Public Works to extend the term of the concession contract as a result of the pandemic, but the MOP was closed to changes in the contract.
Finance Uncovered | 21-Jan-2021
The battle between ConocoPhillips and Vietnam result could mark a significant shift in the way huge multinationals fight off the threat of taxes from desperate revenue authorities in developing countries.
Mediapart | 21-Jan-2021
Vinci et ADP menacent le Chili d’une procédure d’arbitrage, suite à la pandémie et à la réduction concomitante du trafic aérien. Ils utilisent une justice privée qui coûtera des millions aux contribuables chiliens, indépendamment du jugement.
Aero Naves | 21-Jan-2021
Tras la negativa del Ministerio de Obras Públicas a indemnizar a ADP y Vinci por las pérdidas causadas por la pandemia del COVID-19, las dos empresas francesas iniciaron una demanda contra Chile ante el CIADI.
Médias24 | 21-Jan-2021
Dans le conflit opposant le Maroc au groupe américain Carlyle, la position du Royaume a été relativement confortée par une note déposée par l’administration américaine, partie non contestante au litige.
Connaissance des Energies | 20-Jan-2021
Un juge américain a estimé que le processus de la vente d’actions de Citgo, filiale aux États-Unis de la compagnie pétrolière d’État vénézuélienne PDVSA, pour le dédommagement de Crystallex, pouvait débuter.
El Cronista | 20-Jan-2021
El canciller Felipe Solá y el Procurador del Tesoro, Carlos Zannini, quieren revisar los acuerdos de protección de inversiones que determinaron la solución de diferendos en tribunales extranjeros o en el Centro Internacional de Arbitrajes del Banco Mundial.