European Union (EU) member states have signed over 1300 investment treaties with third countries, in addition to some 200 between EU members. Non-EU European states are party to over 500 treaties. Most of these contain investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions, which enable foreign corporations to take ISDS claims against states if they deem their profits or potential investment to be affected by new laws or changes in policy.

The EU has ratified four agreements with an ISDS mechanism: the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), to which 53 European and Central Asian countries are party, the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada, and agreements with Vietnam and Singapore. Only the ECT has been fully in force. The ISDS provisions in the three others will be implemented after all member states have ratified them.

These three deals also include a revised ISDS mechanism created by the European Commission, known as the investment court system. Many critics say that this new system is largely window-dressing and does not address the core of the problem behind investor-state dispute measures.

In 2015, the European Commission asked the EU member states to terminate their intra-EU bilateral investment treaties (BITs), arguing they are incompatible with EU law, which was confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its “Achmea” decision.

As of April 2020, the number of intra-EU ISDS disputes amounted to 170, approximately 17% of all cases globally, 76 of which having been brought under the ECT.

Overall investors from European countries have initiated over 600 ISDS cases, half of which are against non-European states. European countries have been targeted in about 350 cases. Grouped together, investors from EU member states have launched the majority of total disputes (over 400).

Spain, the Czech Republic, Poland, Russia and Ukraine have been among the ten most frequent respondent states, while the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, France, Luxembourg, Italy and Switzerland have been among the ten most frequent home states of the investor.

The most well-known cases include:

Yukos (Isle of Man) vs. Russia: US$50 billion awarded in 2014 to majority shareholders of the oil and gas company (ECT invoked).

Eureko (Netherland) vs. Poland: case settled in 2005 for about €2 billion in favour of the investor, a large European insurance company (Netherland-Poland BIT invoked).

Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka (Czech Republic) vs. Slovak Republic: €553 million awarded in 2004 to the investor, one of the largest commercial banks in the Czech Republic (Czech Republic-Slovak Republic BIT invoked).

Photo: War on Want

(April 2020)

CIAR Global | 22-Nov-2022
La minera Berkeley ha presentado al Gobierno de España la notificación de disputa de inversión, el primer paso que activa las negociaciones antes de la presentación formal de un arbitraje internacional que invoca el incumplimiento del Tratado de la Carta de la Energía (TCE).
Le Progrès | 22-Nov-2022
Un projet pour sa modernisation devait être validé, mais les États membres de l’Union européenne n’arrivent pas à se mettre d’accord.
BX1 | 22-Nov-2022
Les coupoles d’ONG CNCD et le 11.11.11 ont mené jeudi midi une nouvelle action pour appeler le gouvernement fédéral à sortir du Traité sur la Charte de l’Énergie.
Market Watch | 21-Nov-2022
La minera australiana dice que espera unas "rápidas negociaciones" pero abre la puerta a un litigio internacional contra España.
Euractiv | 21-Nov-2022
The European Commission will ask to remove the modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty from the agenda of an ECT summit on Tuesday 22 November after EU countries failed to reach a majority in favour of reforming the charter.
L’Essentiel | 21-Nov-2022
Ce traité permet à des entreprises de réclamer des dédommagements à un État dont les décisions et l’environnement réglementaire affectent la rentabilité de leurs investissements.
Market Watch | 21-Nov-2022
Berkeley Energia Ltd. sent a written notification of an investment dispute to the Spanish government following the rejection of its application to construct a uranium-concentrate plant as a radioactive facility at its Salamanca project in November 2021
Le Monde | 18-Nov-2022
Les institutions et les règles qui organisent la mondialisation constituent un obstacle majeur à la mise en place de toute mesure efficace de protection de l’environnement et de réponse à l’urgence climatique.
Euractiv | 17-Nov-2022
Slovenia is no longer a party to the Energy Charter Treaty after the Foreign Affairs Committee unanimously endorsed the government’s proposal to withdraw.
The Guardian | 15-Nov-2022
Secret court set up under energy charter treaty accused of conflicts of interest, self-regulation issues and institutional bias.

0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | ... | 1840