Energy Charter Treaty

The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is a plurilateral investment agreement between 53 European and Central Asian countries. It was signed in 1994 and entered into force in April 1998.

About 30 countries around the world are at different stages of joining the ECT. Burundi, Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) and Mauritania are first in line, followed by Pakistan and Uganda.

The original objective of the ECT was to overcome the political and economic divisions between Eastern and Western Europe after the demise of the Soviet Union, as well as to strengthen Europe’s energy security. European countries wanted to secure the access to fossil fuel resources of the former Soviet countries by protecting foreign energy investments in these countries.

The ECT provides for an Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism to resolve disputes between an investor and a member state. To this day, it is the world’s most widely used legal instrument for initiating ISDS arbitrations. It has been invoked by investors in 124 cases.

Critics argue that as with most other investment agreements, it places investors’ economic rights and interests over the social, ecological and economic interests of host states and their societies. The ECT imposes obligations on the host state but not on foreign investors. The ECT has also been condemned by environmental activists for protecting the fossil fuel industry and undermining serious climate action.

Spain has been subject to 45 arbitration disputes under the ECT after it implemented a series of energy reforms affecting the renewables sector, including a reduction in subsidies for producers. While some cases are still pending, Spain has already been ordered to pay over €800 million.

You can find out more about the Energy Charter Treaty on the ECT’s dirty secrets website.

Key cases include:

Vattenfall (Sweden) vs. Germany: In 2007 the Swedish energy corporation was granted a provisional permit to build a coal-fired power plant near the city of Hamburg. In an effort to protect the Elbe river from the waste waters dumped from the plant, environmental restrictions were added before the final approval of its construction. The investor initiated a dispute, arguing it would make the project unviable. The case was ultimately settled in 2011, with the city of Hamburg agreeing to the lowering of environmental standards.

Yukos (Isle of Man) vs. Russia: Yukos was a Russian oil and gas company. It was acquired from the Russian government during the controversial “loans for shares” auctions of the mid 1990s, whereby some of the largest state industrial assets were leased (in effect privatized) through auctions for money lent by commercial banks to the government. The auctions were rigged and lacked competition, and effectively became a form of selling for a very low price. In 2003, the Yukos CEO was arrested on charges of fraud and tax evasion and the following year Yukos’ assets were frozen or confiscated. In 2007 Yukos’ former shareholders filed a claim for over US$100 billion, seeking compensation for their expropriation. The dispute resulted in 2014 in the arbitrators awarding the majority shareholders over US$50 billion in damages. The investors have been trying to enforce the award in several countries since then.

NextEra (Netherland) vs. Spain: The Dutch investor filed for arbitration in May 2014, after Spain changed the regulatory framework applicable to its investment, namely the construction of two solar power plants. NextEra claimed that Spain abolished the long-term premium and tariff system, negatively affecting the profitability of the project. However, Spain alleged that NextEra should have been aware that changes could be made to the regulatory regime. In May 2019, the investor was awarded around €290 million. Spain filed for annulment in October 2019.

Photo: Marc Maes / Twitter

Last update: April 2020

CIAR Global | 16-May-2024
El 14 de mayo de 2024, el Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) español publicó la denuncia de España del Tratado de la Carta de la Energía (TCE) y del Protocolo de la Carta de la Energía sobre la eficacia energética y los aspectos medioambientales relacionados.
PSI | 8-May-2024
After a decade long struggle by PSI and affiliates against trade rules that put corporate profits before people, victory is in sight!
La Jornada | 7-May-2024
En lo que va de 2024 ha habido una serie de reveses al neocolonial sistema de protección de inversiones contenido en tratados de libre comercio (TLC) y de inversiones (TBI). Son avances en el contexto de la urgencia que planteó David Boyd, el relator especial de la ONU sobre derechos humanos y medio ambiente (ver Derechos humanos y empresas trasnacionales, La Jornada, 23/10/23).
Jacobin | 6-May-2024
Companies have long used international treaties to try to prevent Global South countries from asserting economic sovereignty. In recent decades, corporations have used such laws to stymie European governments’ attempts to tackle the climate crisis.
Le Vent Se Lève | 6-May-2024
Dès l’indépendance des anciennes colonies européennes, les grandes entreprises extractivistes ont mis en œuvre des mécanismes pour y préserver leurs intérêts économiques.
El Salto | 24-Apr-2024
Con una inmensa mayoría, la eurocámara vota la salida de un tratado que era incompatible con los objetivos climáticos y que España ya anunció que abandonaría.
CIAR Global | 22-Apr-2024
La Corte de Apelación de Svea, en Suecia, ha reconocido los argumentos de España y ha anulado el laudo que daba la razón al fondo de inversión Triodos Sicav II, con sede en Luxemburgo, y dictado por un tribunal bajo administración del instituto de arbitraje del Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
CIAR Global | 12-Apr-2024
El comité ad hoc del procedimiento de anulación solicitado por España en el arbitraje mantenido con la alemana RWE Innogy y la española RWE Innogy Aersa S.A.U. por la reforma de las energías renovables, ante el CIADI, se ha pronunciado a favor de las compañías rechazando el razonamiento de la Abogacía General del Estado española de que el tribunal se extralimitó manifiestamente en sus facultades al contravenir el Derecho de la Unión Europea y aplicar el derecho equivocado.
Zone Bourse | 12-Apr-2024
Le groupe minier australien Berkeley Energia va porter son différend avec l’Espagne devant un tribunal d’arbitrage international après que le pays a refusé de donner son approbation finale à une mine d’uranium près de la ville de Salamanque.
Mining.com | 12-Apr-2024
Australian mining group Berkeley Energia will take its dispute with Spain to international arbitration after the country refused to give final approval to a uranium mine near the city of Salamanca.