investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Vanguardia | 22-Apr-2016
Por cuenta de la globalización en el comercio, muchas cosas han cambiado en los trámites del país y buen número de entidades estatales no se ha percatado de ello.
KEI | 22-Apr-2016
Overall, the investment chapter is designed to give private parties the right to extract costly damages from governments that implement policies that harm profits.
EurActiv | 22-Apr-2016
La nouvelle mouture du règlement des différends entre investisseurs et État n’est pas plus compatible avec les droits humains que la précédente, selon un expert de l’ONU.
EurActiv | 22-Apr-2016
The EU’s new investment court is no more consistent with fundamental rights than the previous investor-state dispute settlement system, according to a UN human rights expert.
Público | 21-Apr-2016
Bruselas sostiene que su renovado sistema de tribunales privados en el tratado comercial con EEUU garantiza el “derecho a regular” de los estados y asegura que dará menos privilegios a las empresas, pero un estudio al que ‘Público’ ha accedido en primicia desmonta esta versión y analiza casos que podrían volver a darse con este mecanismo.
New York Times | 21-Apr-2016
In a major victory for the Russian government, a Dutch court overturned an award of more than $50 billion to former shareholders of the defunct oil company Yukos.
Sputnik | 21-Apr-2016
Un tribunal de la Haye a reconnu que la Cour d’arbitrage de La Haye, qui a condamné la Russie à verser 50 milliards de dollars aux anciens actionnaires de la compagnie Ioukos, n’avait pas les compétences nécessaires à ces fins.
Amigos de la Tierra | 20-Apr-2016
La nueva propuesta europea perpetuará los ataques de los inversores a la salud y el medio ambiente.
Friends of the Earth | 20-Apr-2016
New EU proposal will perpetuate investors’ attacks on health and environment.