Services

Utility corporations have used investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions found in trade and investment agreements to challenge state attempts to regulate privatized public services such as water, social security or other services.

In response to several governments which have tried to lower public services rates for poorer populations or in face of a significant economic crisis, foreign companies have initiated ISDS disputes, claiming they were treated “unfairly”, due to their loss of profits.

Potentially, any significant reforms of standards in relation to major infrastructure or utilities and associated services could be the target of ISDS.

As of end of 2019, about 2/3 of all ISDS disputes concerned the services sector at large, including public services but also financial services, telecommunications, transport, construction, etc.

Most well-known disputes include:

• Azurix (US) v. Argentina: US$165 million awarded in 2006 to the investor, a water company. The dispute arose from the contamination of a reservoir, which made the water undrinkable in the area. The firm claimed the government had expropriated its investment and denied the firm “fair and equitable treatment” by not allowing rate increases and not investing sufficient public funds in the water infrastructure (Argentina-US BIT invoked).

• Tampa Electric Company “TECO” (US) vs. Guatemala: the US-based energy company challenged Guatemala’s decision to lower the electricity rates that a private utility could charge. TECO was awarded US$25 million in 2013 (CAFTA invoked).

• TCW (US) vs. Dominican Republic: the US investment management corporation that jointly owned with the government one of the Dominican Republic’s three electricity distribution firms, sued the government for failing to raise electricity rates and to prevent electricity theft by poor residents. Case settled in 2009 for US$26.5 million paid to the investor (CAFTA invoked).

Photo: Aqua Mechanical / CC BY 2.0

(March 2020)

Buenos Aires Herald | 21-Aug-2024
The country must pay US$340 million for the 2008 “unlawful expropriation” of its flag carrier.
Mouvement Democratie Nouvelle | 12-Jul-2024
Dans l’affaire Seda et autres contre la Colombie concernant le projet immobilier Meritage à Medellin, le Centre international pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements a annoncé le verdict en faveur de l’État colombien.
MSN | 1-Jul-2024
Le Cirdi avait infligé en février dernier une amende de 41,3 millions d’euros à l’État belge dans le cadre d’un différend avec la société de logistique DP World.
Leadership | 24-Jun-2024
Two Nigerian properties located in the United Kingdom are on the verge of being taken over by a Chinese investor following an order granting the investor the right to enforce a $70 million investment treaty award against Nigeria.
Romania-Insider | 17-Jun-2024
Romania won the litigation case filed by the owner of the bankrupt insurer Astra Asigurari, Dutch-based Nova Group Investments controlled by the Adamescu family, according to a note published by the Romanian Ministry of Finance.
bilaterals.org & GRAIN | 3-Jun-2024
Saka chibvumirano ichi chinoreveiko kuzvizvarwa zevmuAfrica zvisinavo chouviri munguva dzekuoma kunyangwe dzekusanaya kwemvura nemaguta?
bilaterals.org & GRAIN | 3-Jun-2024
Hivyo basi, makubaliano haya ya kibiashara yana maana gani kwa Muafrika wa kawaida katika wakati wa majanga makubwa ya kimazingira, kiuchumi na chakula?
bilaterals.org & GRAIN | 3-Jun-2024
Xana ntwanano wa mabindzu lawa wu vula yini eka munhu ntsena wa le Afrika hi nkarhi lowu wa mintlhontlho leyikulu ya maxelo, ikhonomi na swakudya?
MercoPress | 27-May-2024
Chilean and Canadian partners of the Montecon consortium handling operations in the port of Montevideo have started an arbitration process for “damages and losses” worth up to US$ 600 million against the Uruguayan State.
Reuters | 30-Apr-2024
A free-trade agreement between Peru and China, which has been in effect since 2009, protects investments and has allowed increased trade between the countries.