investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

South Centre | 12-Nov-2025
This policy brief examines an innovative judicial approach by the Colombian Constitutional Court in response to an increase in investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) claims.
Global Development Policy Center | 12-Nov-2025
The protection of the Amazon is a central theme of the COP30 in Belém, Brazil. However, efforts to ensure that the Amazon is defended are at risk of instead being defunded—by investor-state dispute settlement.
El Español | 11-Nov-2025
Ferrer ha recurrido al arbitraje del Ciadi como parte de los mecanismos habituales de resolución de disputas internacionales, en línea con lo previsto en los tratados de inversión. Se trata de un proceso estándar en este tipo de situaciones, indican desde la compañía.
Cincodias | 11-Nov-2025
Para sustentar su apelación al Ciadi, los herederos del sultán aseguraban haber realizado una “inversión protegida” en España. Contra eso, la corte de arbitraje internacional concluye que no se podía hablar de ningún modo de inversión protegida, según los términos del Tratado Bilateral de Promoción y Protección Recíproca de Inversiones entre España y Filipinas de 1993.
Agence Ecofin | 11-Nov-2025
Fin 2024, Sarama Resources a lancé une procédure d’arbitrage contre le Burkina Faso après le retrait de ses droits miniers sur le gisement aurifère Tankoro 2. La société réclamait alors environ 117 millions USD à titre de dommages et intérêts à Ouagadougou.
Acces Newswire | 11-Nov-2025
Sarama Resources Ltd. ("Sarama" or the "Company") (TSX-V:SWA)(ASX:SRR) announces that it has filed its written Memorial (the "Memorial") detailing the Company’s claim against the Government of Burkina Faso ("GoBF") as well as damages for the sum of US$242 million, plus interest.
Proceso | 10-Nov-2025
La última demanda contra Honduras data del 15 de mayo del presente año, utiliza el Mecanismo Complementario del CIADI, que permite procesar reclamos de empresas que operan bajo la protección del DR-CAFTA.
The Guardian | 10-Nov-2025
Exclusive: London-based firm with heavyweight backing received £3.3m loan from Treasury fund for start-ups.
Global Justice Now | 7-Nov-2025
Civil society coalition will hold press conference and side event at COP30 to urge governments to go ‘ISDS free’ to protect sovereign climate policy
Criterio | 7-Nov-2025
La Procuraduría General de la República (PGR) anunció el retiro de dos demandas internacionales interpuestas contra el Estado hondureño por las empresas Scatec ASA y Norfund and KLP Norfund Investments AS, ante el CIADI.