investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

The New Indian Express | 22-Aug-2022
Devas Multimedia had won an arbitration award of $1.2 billion after the Indian government terminated its satellite deal with Antrix Corporation, the commercial arm of the ISRO in 2011.
BNE Intellinews | 22-Aug-2022
The half-brother of ousted UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson says he will bring a $50mn lawsuit against Mongolia to try to recover an investment into a mining project that went horribly wrong.
Slovenia Posts English | 22-Aug-2022
Ascent Resources initiated an arbitration dispute in which it is demanding half a billion euros due to Slovenia’s request that an environmental impact assessment should be carried out before fracking in Petišovci.
Le Figaro | 22-Aug-2022
Le gouvernement de l’Équateur a confirmé le versement d’indemnités au groupe pétrolier franco-britannique Perenco, qui a annoncé avoir obtenu le gel d’actifs équatoriens au Luxembourg pour non-respect d’une décision arbitrale.
El Sol de México | 19-Aug-2022
A dos años de la entrada en vigor del nuevo tratado comercial de México con Estados Unidos y Canadá, nuestros socios comerciales nos requirieron consultas respecto a varias medidas que, según su interpretación, favorecen a la CFE y a PEMEX y discriminan o dan un trato menos favorable a las empresas de estos dos países que operan en México.
La Jornada | 11-Aug-2022
México ya ha recibido tres demandas bajo la cláusula de legado del TLCAN en el T-MEC: a) el año pasado la empresa de comunicaciones L1bre Holding de EU le demandó por una cantidad no conocida; b) la petrolera, también estadunidense, Finley Resources (y otras) por 100 millones de dólares, y c) la minera canadiense Finley Resources por 500 millones dólares.
Prensa Comunitaria | 8-Aug-2022
Doce congresistas estadounidenses pidieron al representante del departamento de Estado, Antony Blinken, no prestar servicios diplomáticos a la empresa minera Kappes, estar atentos ante anomalías en los procesos de consulta comunitaria y arbitraje internacional, proteger a integrantes de la resistencia antiminera de la Puya.
Sierra Nevada Ally | 28-Jul-2022
However, locals feel latent tension that the imminent consultation process or the arbitration suit could revive earlier threats, violence, and legal persecution from company employees and contractors.
Investigate Europe | 27-Jul-2022
European governments are still considering withdrawal from the Energy Charter Treaty, despite the EU Commission’s efforts to modernise the controversial pact, documents leaked to Investigate Europe reveal.
Energy Voice | 26-Jul-2022
Germany has agreed to buy a stake in Uniper. The deal is subject to Uniper withdrawing a lawsuit against the Netherlands in connection with the Energy Charter Treaty.