USMCA

The US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA, or CUSMA in Canada) is a comprehensive free trade and investment agreement between Canada, Mexico and the USA. It came into force on 1 July 2020. It replaced the then groundbreaking North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which took effect on 1 January 1994.

NAFTA was an expansion of the 1989 Canada-US Trade Agreement (CUSTA) and was seen as a landmark in setting higher standards in a range of areas, including agriculture, investment, intellectual property, and services.

Dubbed a “death sentence” for Mexico’s campesinos and Indigenous Peoples, NAFTA sparked strong and sustained people’s resistance in Mexico, including the Zapatista uprising. Since taking effect, cheap, subsidized US corn has flooded the market, priced below the cost of production, with which campesinos cannot compete.

Almost two million jobs were lost in Mexico’s agriculture sector in NAFTA’s first ten years. This has led to massive displacement, poverty, and hunger.

NAFTA’s Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism - in which an investor from one signatory country can sue the government of another signatory country for actions or omissions which it claims to interfere with its right to make a profit - raised concerns about the way in which the agreement furthered the interests of transnational corporations, and limited the capacity of governments to regulate the economy for social, environmental or other reasons.

The ISDS mechanism has taken a toll on Mexico and Canada, which have been sued respectively 20 times and 27 times, mostly by US investors.

NAFTA was also criticized for boosting low wage and working conditions jobs, especially along the US-Mexico border, where over 3,000 maquiladoras employ over a million Mexicans, mostly women who earn about US$5 a day.

On 1 January 2008, the last agricultural tariffs were eliminated under NAFTA and small farm organizations in Mexico declared “all-out war” on the trade agreement, arguing that the country’s food sovereignty and security are in peril. Massive peasant demonstrations against NAFTA were held throughout Mexico in early 2008.

The 2016 Trump presidential campaign called for NAFTA’s termination. But instead, the new US administration decided to tweak the deal and started the renegotiation process in May 2017.

The USMCA was signed on 30 November 2018, after the US clinched separate deals with Canada and Mexico. Mexico ratified the agreement in June 2019. Ratification is pending in Canada, but stalled in the US, due to concerns of the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives over workers rights, the environment and issues related to pharmaceuticals.

The USMCA has been criticized for going even further towards trade liberalization than NAFTA. Small farmers’ organizations say that it will privilege large agribusiness corporations over family farmers and the environment (including climate change). Public information about chemicals used in agriculture and food labeling will also be limited. In May 2017, many groups met in Mexico City and called for a new model of integration, cooperation and exchange among nations that respects human, political, economic, social, cultural and environmental rights.

The new NAFTA follows the US-proposed language on intellectual property and e-commerce in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) – now Comprehensive and Progressive TPP without the US. It will force Mexico to join the UPOV91 Convention - plant variety protection patent-like rules which prevent farmers from saving and exchanging seeds. It also restricts data localization policies and bans restrictions on data transfers across borders, procedures that can be used to keep sensitive personal information, such as health data, within local jurisdictions. The deal originally provided a minimum of 10 years of marketing exclusivity for cutting-edge biologic medicines, which include many new cancer treatments and even vaccines, beyond the 20 years of patent protection stated in TRIPs (Trade-Related aspects of Intellectual Property rights) standards but the provision was removed eventually.

Negotiators claim to have secured sweeping progress on labour protection However, no clear enforcement mechanism is set down so these are little more than voluntary guidelines.

The ISDS mechanism between the US and Canada, and between Mexico and Canada has been removed – even though it is included in the TPP, to which both countries belong. New procedures replace the ISDS between the US and Mexico. Expansive rights for investors are mostly terminated. Only limited claims are allowed after exhaustion of local remedies. But the ISDS mechanism has been maintained between the two countries for claims pertaining to Mexico’s oil and gas sector.

The text of the agreement: https://www.bilaterals.org/?united-states-mexico-canada

last update: August 2021
Photo: Jim Winstead/CC BY 2.0


BNN | 12-Feb-2024
Three decades have passed since NAFTA was implemented, leaving unfulfilled promises of mutual prosperity. This article examines the realities of US-Mexico trade, illegal immigration, and the loss of manufacturing jobs, and calls for a reevaluation of the agreement’s impact.
El Economista | 22-Jan-2024
La nueva organización sindical denominada Confederación Central Nacional presentó una queja laboral bajo el Mecanismo Laboral de Respuesta Rápida este 17 de enero para evidenciar la actuación de la empresa RV Fresh Foods.
Mexico News Daily | 22-Jan-2024
Claiming that RV Fresh Foods has violated their labor rights, a group representing local workers filed a petition under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the free trade pact that superseded NAFTA.
El Economista | 16-Jan-2024
En los últimos cinco años se han realizado el 40% de las reformas laborales de los últimos 28 años; sin embargo, “no han dado fruto de mejoría, prevalece la pobreza laboral y la informalidad”, coincidieron especialistas al participar en el foro “Tendencias 2024, Laboral, Capital Humano y Seguridad Social”.
Nexos | 12-Jan-2024
Treinta años después de la firma del TLCAN, quisiera sugerir que la situación de las clases trabajadoras de los tres países es hoy en día peor que antes de 1994, por lo menos en términos relativos de poder frente al capital.
La Presse | 12-Jan-2024
La première révision de l’ACEUM doit avoir lieu en 2026, soit à l’occasion du sixième anniversaire de son entrée en vigueur. Les trois partenaires commerciaux doivent procéder à l’examen et confirmer leur désir de le renouveler pour une autre période de six ans.