investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

El Confidencial | 27-Jan-2020
El Gobierno ha recibido una reclamación en EEUU después de aprobar un decreto ley para frenar el alud de arbitrajes por los recortes a las renovables.
ObservAlgerie | 24-Jan-2020
Le holding suisse United Agencies de la compagnie maritime Marine Shipping Co (MSC) demande à obtenir le transfert des dividendes de sa filiale MSC Algeria qui serait bloqué par le gouvernement algérien.
NewStatesman | 24-Jan-2020
Boris Johnson’s plan to diverge from EU rules threatens crucial environmental regulations.
El Universal | 24-Jan-2020
El Acuerdo para la Promoción y Protección Recíproca de las Inversiones permite la transferencia libre de capitales y acceso al arbitraje internacional para la solución de controversias.
El Confidencial | 23-Jan-2020
La corte arbitral del Banco Mundial dicta un laudo que obliga al pago de más de 80 millones más intereses. La reclamación se elevó por el recorte de ocho instalaciones eólicas de 333MW.
Vanguardia | 22-Jan-2020
Con la delimitación del Párama de Santurbán en el 2014, la multinacional minera no pudo ejecutar su proyecto Angostura con el que pretendía extraer oro y plata.
WirtschaftsWoche | 22-Jan-2020
The energy company Vattenfall is demanding compensation from the Federal Republic of Germany. The costs for the arbitration proceedings could exceed 20 million euros this year.
Global Legal Chronicle | 22-Jan-2020
Chile obtained back-to-back wins in parallel arbitrations in the longstanding and high-profile Pey Casado dispute.
Kluwer Arbitration Blog | 20-Jan-2020
Despite debates about crisis in investment treaty arbitration, most emerging market economies are concluding BITs that provide for ISDS and emerging market multinational companies appear to welcome ISDS.
The Citizen | 20-Jan-2020
The dispute is related to Canada-based company Montero Mining’s investment in the Wigu Hill rare earth element project.