investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

News Day FR | 17-Jan-2022
Enagás a déposé un arbitrage contre le Pérou afin de rapporter à l’Espagne 160 millions de dollars de dividendes de ses filiales dans le pays.
CIAR Global | 14-Jan-2022
México ha sido considerado responsable en el conflicto con PACC Offshore Services Holdings (POSH) ante un tribunal de arbitraje de inversiones.
Devdiscourse | 13-Jan-2022
Two separate arbitrations were also initiated under the bilateral investment treaty BIT by Mauritius investors in Devas Multimedia under the India-Mauritius BIT and by Deutsche Telekom under the India Germany BIT.
Yonhap | 13-Jan-2022
En junio de 2018, el CIADI ordenó al Gobierno de Seúl que pagara a la familia Dayyani unos 63 millones de dólares, pero el pago no se ha realizado debido a las sanciones de EE. UU. sobre Irán.
Yonhap | 13-Jan-2022
En juin 2018, le CIRDI a ordonné au gouvernement de Séoul de payer à la famille Dayyani environ 63 millions de dollars, mais le paiement n’a pas été effectué en raison des sanctions américaines imposées contre l’Iran.
Euractiv | 13-Jan-2022
Last year Ascent Resources initiated arbitration proceedings against the Slovenian state under the UK-Slovenia Bilateral Investment Treaty and the Energy Charter Treaty.
Venezuelanalysis | 12-Jan-2022
With the US-backed "interim presidency" not going away, what are the implications for Venezuela’s foreign assets?
Yonhap | 12-Jan-2022
In June 2018, the ICSID ordered Korea to pay the Dayyani family about US$63 million, but the payment has not been made due to US sanctions on Iran.
The Hindu | 10-Jan-2022
It quashes order permitting seizure of funds belonging to Airports Authority of India.
Seneweb | 8-Jan-2022
L’homme d’affaires Louis Claude Norland Suzor a saisi le CIRDI pour avoir été éjecté de la centrale de Sendou, où il était le principal promoteur, au profit de l’investisseur, Barak Fund.