investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Diario Financiero | 21-Mar-2022
En 2019 el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias Relativas a Inversiones falló que el gobierno de Pakistán debía pagar US$ 5.900 millones a la empresa Tethyan Copper Company.
Breageek News | 21-Mar-2022
Barrick Gold a mis fin à un différend de longue date avec le Pakistan et va maintenant commencer à développer l’un des plus grands projets miniers d’or et de cuivre au monde.
The Express Tribune | 21-Mar-2022
In 2019, the ICSID tribunal had given an award over $6 billion against Pakistan to the TCC. At the same time, the London Court of Arbitration also imposed another $4 billion fine on Pakistan.
The Express Tribune | 17-Mar-2022
Washington DC’s District Court has dismissed Pakistan’s motions for stay enforcement of $6 billion award against the country in Reko Diq case.
Natural Gas World | 17-Mar-2022
It now says legislators are amending Slovenia’s mining law to further restrict "all forms of hydraulic stimulation", and this could increase damages it is due under its arbitration claim.
CIAR Global | 16-Mar-2022
El informe por Climate Change Counsel muestra que las cuestiones relativas al cambio climático y a la transición energética han estado ausentes de los laudos arbitrales en el marco del Tratado sobre la Carta de la Energía.
Piensa Chile | 16-Mar-2022
Las organizaciones sociales, ambientales, sindicales, políticas y culturales que integramos la Plataforma Chile Mejor sin TLC, impulsoras de la Iniciativa Popular sobre Tratados de Libre Comercio hacemos un llamado de atención sobre esta contradictoria propuesta.
Chile Mejor sin TLC | 15-Mar-2022
Las organizaciones sociales, ambientales, sindicales, políticas y culturales que integramos la Plataforma Chile Mejor sin TLC, impulsoras de la Iniciativa Popular sobre Tratados de Libre Comercio votada favorablemente por ustedes el pasado 1 de febrero, hacemos un llamado de atención sobre esta contradictoria propuesta.
Climate Change Counsel | 15-Mar-2022
In 2021-22, Climate Change Counsel conducted a study of arbitral awards rendered under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT).