Energy & environment

Most investor-state disputes (ISDS) have concerned environmental matters. Corporations are using the ISDS system found in trade and investment agreements to challenge environmental policies. As of end of 2019, 41% of all ICSID cases were energy and natural resources-related.

Most well-known cases include:

• Lone Pine Resources (US) vs. Canada: the investor challenged Quebec’s moratorium on the controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, for natural gas. The provincial government declared the moratorium in 2011 so as to conduct an environmental impact assessment of the extraction method widely accused of leaching chemicals and gases into groundwater and the air. Case pending (NAFTA invoked).

• Bilcon (US) vs. Canada: the US industry challenged Canadian environmental requirements affecting their plans to open a basalt quarry and a marine terminal in Nova Scotia. In 2015 the ISDS tribunal decided that the government’s decision hindered the investors’ expectations. Bilcon won and received US$7 million in damages, plus interest (NAFTA invoked).

• Vattenfall (Sweden) vs. Germany: in 2007 the Swedish energy corporation was granted a provisional permit to build a coal-fired power plant near the city of Hamburg. In an effort to protect the Elbe river from the waste waters dumped from the plant, environmental restrictions were added before the final approval of its construction. The investor initiated a dispute, arguing it would make the project unviable. The case was ultimately settled in 2011, with the city of Hamburg agreeing to the lowering of environmental standards (ECT invoked).

Photo: Kris Krug / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

(March 2020)

Ecoactu | 13-Jun-2025
L’entreprise minière britannique Emmerson Plc a engagé une procédure d’arbitrage international contre le Royaume du Maroc devant le Centre international pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements (CIRDI).
Common Frontiers | 11-Jun-2025
El gobierno canadiense no debería implementar el acuerdo de libre comercio recientemente firmado con Ecuador debido a su potencial de facilitar abusos ambientales y de los derechos humanos.
CCPA | 11-Jun-2025
Le gouvernement canadien ne devrait pas mettre en œuvre l’accord de libre-échange récemment signé avec l’Équateur, car cet accord risque de faciliter les atteintes à l’environnement et aux droits humains.
CCPA | 11-Jun-2025
The Canadian government should not implement the recently-signed free trade agreement with Ecuador because the agreement’s potential to facilitate environmental and human rights abuses.
Amelia Rueda | 11-Jun-2025
La empresa EBI, dedicada al manejo de residuos, inició un proceso de arbitraje internacional contra el Estado costarricense bajo el TBI Costa Rica-Canadá, en relación al desarrollo de un proyecto de relleno sanitario en Turrúcares, Alajuela.
Criterio | 10-Jun-2025
EE.UU. recordó que el CAFTA-DR impone un plazo de tres años para presentar reclamos desde que el inversionista conoce el hecho y el daño, y que exceder ese límite puede llevar al rechazo del caso por falta de jurisdicción.
Energy News | 6-Jun-2025
Le gouvernement espagnol a effectué un premier paiement dans le cadre d’un arbitrage international, en règlement d’un jugement datant de 2021 concernant la modification des incitations fiscales offertes aux investisseurs dans les énergies renouvelables.
Bloomberg | 5-Jun-2025
The Spanish government made its first payment as a result of an arbitration decision in 2021 around the country’s move to change investor incentives tied to renewable energy projects, following a number of lengthy legal battles between Spain and various creditors.
Baltic Times | 5-Jun-2025
In late 2021, RSE filed a lawsuit against Latvia, claiming that the amendments made to the electricity support regulation between 2012 and 2016 violated international obligations.
Latham & Watkins | 5-Jun-2025
The landmark decision protects Croatia from defending against duplicative claims brought by investor.