investor-state disputes | ISDS

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) refers to a way of handling conflicts under international investment agreements whereby companies from one party are allowed to sue the government of another party. This means they can file a complaint and seek compensation for damages. Many BITs and investment chapters of FTAs allow for this if the investor’s expectation of a profit has been negatively affected by some action that the host government took, such as changing a policy. The dispute is normally handled not in a public court but through a private abritration panel. The usual venues where these proceedings take place are the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank), the International Chamber of Commerce, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law or the International Court of Justice.

ISDS is a hot topic right now because it is being challenged very strongly by concerned citizens in the context of the EU-US TTIP negotiations, the TransPacific Partnership talks and the CETA deal between Canada and the EU.

Yahoo | 14-Feb-2023
Winshear Gold Corp. reports that the evidentiary hearing commences today in Washington D.C..
Mining.com | 13-Feb-2023
The minister noted the parties will continue negotiating within the framework of a free trade agreement between Canada and Panama and international arbitration rules.
The Guardian | 13-Feb-2023
Secret international court system enables fossil fuel firms to sue governments for lost future profits.
Euractiv | 13-Feb-2023
Bern said it will not join the European Union’s proposed mass exit from a controversial energy investment protection treaty, sparking fears that fossil fuel companies will use Switzerland as a rear base to keep suing governments over climate action.
CIAR Global | 10-Feb-2023
La minera Berkeley ha informado del nuevo rechazo del Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico (MITECO) a autorizar la construcción de una planta de uranio en Salamanca.
Reuters | 8-Feb-2023
The European Commission has told member countries that a joint EU exit from a controversial international energy treaty appears inevitable.
Zone Bourse | 8-Feb-2023
Berkeley a déclaré qu’elle estime également que le rejet n’est pas légal car il a empiété sur ses droits en vertu d’un accord international connu sous le nom de Traité sur la Charte de l’énergie.
Mining.com | 8-Feb-2023
Berkeley said it also believes the rejection is not legal as it infringed on its rights under an international agreement known as the Energy Charter Treaty.
Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung | 8-Feb-2023
Investor rights in the expired North American Free Trade Agreement continue to undermine democratic decision-making and climate policy in Mexico, Canada, and the United States.
The Hindu BusinessLine | 7-Feb-2023
The Supreme Court of Netherlands refused to overturn $111.3 million arbitral award levied by the District Court of Hague, finding the Indian government liable for improperly terminating the Devas-Antrix deal in 2011.