Colombia has sent a strong signal about corporate influence over its climate policies as it gears up to host the first Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels. Can the world follow?
L’« éléphant dans la pièce » des négociations climatiques tient en grande partie au fait que le cadre juridique international protège le capitalisme fossile.
Le règlement des différends entre investisseurs et États (ISDS, selon le sigle anglais) menace la transition juste vers l’abandon des énergies fossiles et la transformation sociale et écologique dont les populations et la planète ont un besoin urgent.
Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) threatens a just transition from fossil fuels and the urgent need for a social and ecological transformation for people and the planet.
From 24-29 April 2026, Colombia and the Netherlands are co-hosting the First Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels in Santa Marta. The goal is urgent and widely shared: to accelerate a just and orderly phase-out of coal, oil and gas.
Current discussions around fossil fuel phase-out create a key opportunity to make progress on addressing this barrier. Civil society organisations are calling on European governments to explore and act on collectively disengaging from ISDS.
Le dirigimos esta carta a usted en calidad de economistas y académicos del derecho profundamente preocupados porque el sistema de arbitraje de inversión constituye un serio obstáculo para la construcción de sociedades prósperas, equitativas y sostenibles.
We write to you as economists and legal scholars deeply concerned that investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) poses a serious obstacle to building prosperous, equitable, and sustainable societies.
Fossil fuel investors are increasingly using ISDS to challenge climate mitigation measures and seek significant compensation. This legal risk can delay climate ambition and drain public finances needed for the transition.