US-Peru

On 7 December 2005, Peru and the United States signed a bilateral treaty called the Trade Promotion Agreement.

The signing triggered a wave of public demonstrations in 2005. Prominent among the organizers were small farm organizations asserting that they would likely be hit the hardest by the resulting elimination of tariffs and other trade protections. The Peruvian government claimed that it would offer subsidies to reduce the agreement’s impact on small farmers, just as the United States does for its own agricultural sector. When the government failed to live up to this promise, the peasants marched in protest, demanding that the subsidies be released. In the midst of these protests, Peru ratified the FTA in June 2006.

February 2008 saw a new round of protests dubbed the “Paralización Nacional Agrícola” (National Agrarian Shutdown), in which thousands of small farmers participated. The protests, organized by the Comando Nacional Unitario de Lucha de los Campesinos Peruanos, were repressed by the authorities, leaving a total of four dead.

As part of the legislative package required by the FTA prior to its entry into force on 1 January 2009, the Peruvian executive branch – making use of the legislative powers granted by Congress – passed Legislative Decree 1015 on May 20 reducing the percentage of peasant and indigenous community members required to vote in order to sell or give concessions on their land in mountain and jungle areas.

In reaction, indigenous people from the Peruvian Amazon held several weeks of protests in August 2008 calling for the revocation of over 30 FTA-related decrees affecting their land rights. They were successful in getting the Peruvian Congress to revoke Decrees 1015 and 1073.

Also in August 2008, the Andean Community of Nations (CAN) amended Decision 486 regarding intellectual property in order to allow Peru to implement the FTA with the US. The amendment, initially rejected by Bolivia, brought CAN to the brink of dissolution.

The US-Peru FTA took effect on 1 February 2009.

last update: May 2012

Photo: Giuliano Koren / Global Giving


Mining Journal | 4-Mar-2020
Cerro Verde, a partnership between Freeport McMoran and Buenaventura, is to bring a case against Peru related to a taxation dispute at the ICSID under a US-Peru trade agreement.
Infobae | 2-Mar-2020
La minera Cerro Verde, controlada por la estadounidense Freeport-McMoRan, inició un procedimiento internacional de arbitraje contra Perú por una disputa sobre el pago de millonarias regalías.
Ciar Global | 18-Feb-2020
The arbitration between the US mining company Renco Group and Peru in relation to the metallurgical deposit in La Oroya was reopened, at the request of the mining company.
Ciar Global | 17-Feb-2020
El arbitraje entre la minera estadounidense Renco Group y Perú relacionado con el yacimiento metalúrgico La Oroya se abrió de nuevo, a instancias de la minera.
El Buho | 10-Jan-2019
Alrededor de diez compañías peruanas han venido exportando alrededor de 250 millones de dólares en madera proveniente de zonas protegidas de la Amazonía, generando una dinámica social de corrupción y violencia derivada de su enfrentamiento con líderes sociales y ecologistas de la zona.
Posta | 7-Jan-2019
El representante comercial de Estados Unidos dio el viernes el primer paso para posiblemente imponer sanciones a Perú por supuestas violaciones a las protecciones ambientales incluidas en su pacto de libre comercio.